Overview
Comprehensive feasibility study for establishing multimodal coal transportation system combining rail, coastal shipping, and inland waterways. The study evaluated technical requirements, infrastructure needs, operational model, cost economics, and environmental benefits of multimodal coal logistics compared to conventional rail-only transportation.
Client
A major power utility planning coal procurement for thermal power plants located in coastal regions. The client sought alternative transportation solutions to reduce dependence on congested rail corridors and achieve cost savings through multimodal logistics combining sea and river transport with rail.
Challenge
The key challenge was designing an efficient multimodal system that could match the reliability of rail transport while offering cost advantages. Critical issues included evaluating available waterway infrastructure, assessing vessel requirements and availability, determining optimal transshipment points, minimizing cargo handling and transfer costs, and ensuring year-round operability considering seasonal variations in waterway depths.
Methodology
The study involved route analysis from coal mines in Odisha/Jharkhand to power plants via combination of rail-to-port, coastal shipping, and inland waterway segments. Infrastructure assessment covered port facilities, inland terminals, cargo handling systems, and storage requirements. Vessel specifications were developed for coastal vessels (5,000-10,000 DWT) and river barges. Cost modeling compared multimodal transport economics with existing rail freight, including capital costs, operating expenses, transit times, and inventory carrying costs. Environmental impact assessment quantified carbon emissions reduction and fuel consumption benefits.
i-maritime Proposition
i-maritime recommended a multimodal corridor: mine to Paradip/Haldia port by rail (300-400 km), coastal shipping to destination port (1,000-1,200 km), and inland waterway/short rail to power plant (50-100 km). The system could transport 3-5 million tonnes annually with 15-20% cost savings versus direct rail freight. Infrastructure requirements included coal loading terminal at port, mechanized cargo handling, and dedicated berths at destination. Vessel fleet included 4-6 self-unloading coastal vessels and supporting barges. Implementation plan covered equipment procurement, regulatory approvals, and phased deployment over 18-24 months. The solution also offered environmental benefits with 30-35% lower carbon emissions compared to rail transport, supporting sustainability goals.